Reflections on the Ukrainian War
I may be a little cynical, but the longer this war in Ukraine is reported upon, the more curious I become on why it is being reported as it is. Those of us of a certain age grew up watching World War 2 play out on our television screens. We watched the replays of the various news outlets and the propaganda films of the War and Navy Departments, and I find myself marveling at the contrast between then and now.
World War 2 was covered as a clash of armies and of battles on the seas and in the air. December 7th, the American entry into the war, wasn’t reported as an attack on Honolulu or even on Oahu. We saw the Japanese attack on the naval anchorage in Pearl Harbor, the air bases at Hickam and Wheeler, and Army installations at Schofield Barracks and Fort Shafter. There were civilian casualties, but they were collateral damage to the Japanese attack.
From the German and Soviet invasion of Poland in September 1939 to the surrender of Japan on the deck of the USS Missouri in September 1945, this war was reported as the march of armies and great battles fought from the Russian steppes to the African deserts, battles between great fleets from Midway to the Coral Sea, and air raids over embattled Europe. Seldom were civilians mentioned other that as collateral damage as an incident of the war.
Seldom, that is, unless those were good guy civilians. The Battle of Britian was shown from the perspective of both the great heroism by the outmanned and out-gunned Royal Air Force, and as the remarkable endurance of the British people as they bore down and endured during the destruction of their cities and homes by the German bombers. The newsreels highlighted the suffering of “our” people in the war even as the destruction of Italian and German and Japanese cities were celebrated.
Now don’t get me wrong. Just as you can’t make an omelet without cracking eggs, you can’t fight a war without killing civilians along with those in uniform. My sympathies lie with the attacked not the attackers. (Unless, of course, those attackers are “my” attackers. Then the sympathies can get a little confused.)
All this to bring us to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and how it is being reported. Ukraine has 200,000 active-duty soldiers and another 600,000 or so reservists and veterans of previous conflicts with the Russians. The Russians have been gnawing away at Ukraine since at least 2014 and the Ukrainian military is well-versed in Russian military tactics and how to counter them. Ukraine is not a helpless child whimpering in the corner. These are tough people used to tough times and they have a long memory of Stalin’s starving to death of some 2 million of them during the 1930s (a fact the New York Times denied at the time and has not corrected since) to bring those Ukrainian peasants into submission to his socialist ideals. But this is not how this war is being reported. Correct me if I’m not seeing everything, but I’ve not seen one Ukrainian general or colonel speaking to their victories in the reports by the major media outlets. I’ve not seen a single graphic showing how the Ukrainian army is deploying to counter the Russians nor how the use of American and European weaponry is being used by them to great result.
Now we know the Ukrainians are enjoying success on the battlefield. Russian units are being decimated. But if we only knew what the media is showing us, these successes are by Molotov cocktail-throwing grandmothers defending their homes and shops, and not by well-armed and well-trained professional soldiers defending their homeland. This war is being reported as a war on civilians resisted by civilians, and the question is, “Why?”
Fleeing women and crying children make good video. It is easy enough to pluck the heartstrings by showing a bloodied woman clutching her wounded child, or to show them in refugee encampments in Poland and elsewhere standing in soup lines and weeping over not knowing what tomorrow will hold. It makes good video, but poor understanding about how the war is being waged from the Ukrainian side. Watching 30 minutes of reporting by PBS or CBS or NBC (Russell Holt is on the ground in Poland with Mr. Biden and I cannot understand why he is the only person in the shot wearing a mask – but that’s a rant for another day!) or the BBC or DW or any of the other “news” organizations will give us tears but no understanding. How is the war progressing from an operational or strategic perspective? We have no way of knowing from their reporting. We know some Ukrainian cities are being reduced to rubble, but no one is pointing out that can be a really bad idea from the attackers’ perspective. Rubble makes great defensive positions.
So we have a fairly good picture of the civilian dislocation caused by the Russian invasion but no picture at all of how Ukrainian defenses are holding. And this, now I get to my point, is the strategy behind the reporting/propaganda effort. We hate Russia. We’ve hated Russia since the 1918 Communist Revolution. We even hated them when they were our allies during WW2 – that alliance was a marriage of convenience not of shared values. We hated them during the communist uprising in Greece, the Berlin Airlift, the Korean War (Russian pilots were flying missions for the Norks), the Vietnam War, and the entire Cold War. And our ancestors hated Russia long before our hating began. Russia has been a contender for European dominance since at least Peter the Great (in other words, since before the United States were even a twinkle in the eye of our founders’ fathers) and our European ancestors weren’t about to surrender their grip on power. So, we hated Russia yesterday; we hate Russia today; and we’ll hate Russia tomorrow. And by “we” I mean those who hold the reins of power and influence.
Wars take time and consume resources that might be better used in other endeavors. And people, especially the American people who are entertaining themselves to death with Tik-Tok videos, have a very short attention span. (Most will find this essay too long to hold their attention.) How do you get them to stay engaged – to stay engaged and be willing to lower their standard of living to pursue the war? By highlighting helpless women and children. I’ve railed against our feminized culture and political landscape elsewhere and I need not pursue it further other than to say that the way to keep American women focused on what you want them to see, is to show them how a terrible man (Vladimir Putin) is making women and children suffer. (He probably tortures cats too!)
Pershing said Infantry wins battles, but logistics wins wars. Wars are fought on three levels: the tactical, the operational, and the strategic. The tactical is led by captains and non-commissioned officers. The operational is led by commanders of battalions, brigades, and divisions. The strategic (from the American military perspective) is led by the highest ranks of the flag officers and their civilian overseers at the Department of Defense, the State Department, and the White House. Captains fight skirmishes: colonels fight battles; generals fight campaigns; politicians fight wars. And the news front is part of the war effort.
The newsreels of WW2 were propaganda videos. They presented the war effort in a way to keep the populace motivated to continue the war in the face of shortages by showing them great campaign victories and highlighting the evil intent of the enemy (which wasn’t hard given the evil that had seized Germany with the rise of the National Socialists). Much of the rationing that was imposed on the populace and the rubber and metal collection campaigns were designed to let the people feel they were participating in the war effort even when little of it was needed in much the same way as the government’s Covid restrictions were designed to control the people and not the virus (which is far more difficult if not impossible to control).
So, today’s video from the front is not intended to inform, but to control and motivate. I’m not saying that it is out of evil intent by government and media, but it is manipulation not information, and Caveat Emptor.